Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 28;5:26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2016.10.002

Table 2.

Behavioral Performance during the Emotional Word-Face Stroop Task.

Measures Mean SD Range Mean SD Range Paired t-test
Difference p-value
Congruent Incongruent
Reaction Time (ms) 729.36 62.65 664–875.1 752.68 58.09 672.7–882 17.944 <0.003 **
Accuracy % 0.90 0.09 0.69–1 0.89 0.08 0.71–0.98 0.006 0.538 ns
Timeouts % 0.04 0.05 0–0.2 0.06 0.05 0.01–0.21 0.027 <0.001 ***
Twins with Stress Control Co-Twins
Congruent RT (ms) 734.66 70.64 686.9–875.1 724.05 58.72 664–837.8 10.404 0.786 ns
Incongruent RT (ms) 757.89 65.37 698.8–882 747.46 54.55 672.7–840.3 13.464 0.714 ns
I-C RT (ms) 23.23 14.78 6.93–51.19 23.41 16.47 2.48–45.22 3.061 0.718 ns
I-C/C RT (ms) 0.03 0.02 0.008–0.073 0.03 0.02 0.003–0.061 0.003 0.755 ns
Congruent Accuracy % 0.90 0.09 0.75–1 0.90 0.10 0.69–0.97 0.018 0.525 ns
Incongruent Accuracy % 0.89 0.08 0.75–0.98 0.89 0.09 0.71–0.97 0.017 0.444 ns
I-C ACC −0.01 0.02 −0.03–0.03 −0.01 0.05 −0.09–0.06 0.001 0.967 ns
I-C/C ACC 0.00 0.03 −0.03–0.04 0.00 0.05 −0.1–0.07 0.000 0.989 ns
Congruent Timeouts % 0.05 0.07 0.00–0.20 0.04 0.04 0.00–0.12 0.005 0.643 ns
Incongruent Timeouts % 0.06 0.07 0.009–0.21 0.05 0.04 0.01–0.13 0.009 0.702 ns

Note. Significant results in bold. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, †p < 0.10, n = 7 twin pairs.