Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 19;55(2):691–701. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160581

Table 3.

Factors associated with PIM use

No PIM PIM OR Bootstrap z p 95% CI
n = 244 n = 90 Std. Err.
Age, mean (SD) 80.1 (5.62) 79.2 (5.31) 0.96 0.025 –1.54 0.125 0.91 1.01
Sex (female), n (%) 135 (55.3) 59 (65.6) 1.97 0.718 1.87 0.062 0.966 4.03
Living situation (living alone), n (%) 119 (48.8) 47 (52.2) 1.10 0.39 0.27 0.791 0.55 2.19
Cognitive impairment (MMSE), mean (SD) 22.4 (5.05) 23.5 (4.18) 1.01 0.033 0.40 0.689 0.95 1.08
Functional status (B-ADL), mean (SD) 3.5 (2.33) 3.3 (2.27) 1.00 0.086 0.03 0.972 0.85 1.19
Depression (GDS), n (%) 34 (70.8) 14 (29.2) 1.15 0.506 0.31 0.759 0.48 2.72
Number of drugs, mean (SD) 7.0 (3.50) 8.3 (3.15) 1.11 0.060 2.02 0.043 1.00 1.24
Dementia diagnosis, n (%) 102 (41.8) 23 (25.6) 0.58 0.237 –1.33 0.183 0.26 1.29

Multivariate conditional fixed-effects logistic regression analysis (n = 334 patients assigned to n = 44 clusters): Wald chi2(8) = 11.08, p = 0.1971. Data presented as mean±standard deviation or n (%). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination (range 0–30; higher score indicates better cognitive functioning); B-ADL, Bayer Activities of Daily Living Scale (range 0–10; lower score indicates better performance); GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale (sum score 0–15; score ≥6 indicates depression). Bold p-values indicate p < 0.05.