Table 2. Differences in the structures of the fecal microbiota communities of Mangalarga Marchador fillies that underwent a 42-days aerobic fitness program and were supplemented orally with L-carnitine and chromium as evaluated by parsimony and AMOVA analyses.
Tests | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Comparisons | Yue & Clayton | Jaccard | ||
Parsimony | AMOVA | Parsimony | AMOVA | |
C0 vs. C42 | 0.926 | 0.196 | 0.031 | 0.04 |
E0 vs. E42 | 0.562 | 0.522 | 0.023 | 0.009 |
Car0 vs. Car42 | 0.151 | 0.098 | 0.16 | 0.047 |
Chr0 vs. Chr42 | 0.29 | 0.147 | 0.041 | 0.034 |
C42 vs. E42 | 0.572 | 0.301 | 0.014 | 0.077 |
C42 vs. Car42 | 0.168 | 0.119 | 0.017 | 0.003 |
C42 vs. Chr42 | 0.765 | 0.097 | 0.044 | 0.036 |
E42 vs. Car42 | 0.572 | 0.86 | 0.938 | 0.771 |
E42 vs. Chr42 | 0.751 | 0.745 | 0.295 | 0.692 |
Control group (C0, n = 3) did not exercise; C42 = control after 42 days (did not exercise); E0 = only conditioning (before); E42 = only conditioning after 42 days; Car0 = before conditioning and L-carnitine supplementation; Car42 = conditioning and supplementation with L-carnitine after 42 days; Chr0 = before conditioning and chromium supplementation; Chr42 = conditioning and supplementation with chromium for 42 days. Effect of conditioning: E0 vs. E42; Car0 vs. Car42 and Chr0 vs. Chr42. Comparisons between control group and exercise conditioning/exercise conditioning-supplemented groups: C42 vs. E42; C42 vs. Car42 and C42 vs. Chr42. Comparisons between exercise conditioning and exercise conditioning-supplemented groups: E42 vs. Car42; E42 vs. Chr42. The numbers are P values and evaluation time with significance <0.05 are in bold.