Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec 26;68(4):654–663. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.024

Table 4.

Variations in self-rated health and overweight and obesity across settlement types, adjusted for individuals’ characteristics, in relation to area-level deprivation and to administrative region of location.

Poor self-rated health
Overweight and obesity
Other cities
Semi-rural areas
Villages
Other cities
Semi-rural areas
Villages
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Area-level deprivationa
Lower deciles 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Mid deciles 1.36 (1.23–1.49) 1.22 (1.00–1.50) 1.45 (1.18–1.79) 1.19 (1.11–1.29) 1.28 (1.06–1.54) 1.08 (0.90–1.29)
Higher deciles 1.86 (1.68–2.06) 1.80 (1.29–2.50) 3.21 (1.03–9.98) 1.25 (1.15–1.37) 1.45 (1.05–2.02) 0.62 (0.21–1.87)
Between-area variation
 Variance component 0.090*** 0.039 0.129** 0.068*** 0.078* 0.095**
 Change in variance (%) −0.3 −0.5 −0.2 −0.1 −0.1 0.0
Administrative regionsb
South East 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
South West 0.90 (0.78–1.04) 0.94 (0.62–1.41) 1.32 (0.89–1.95) 0.91 (0.81–1.03) 1.21 (0.86–1.71) 1.41 (1.05–1.90)
East of England 1.00 (0.87–1.16) 1.27 (0.88–1.82) 1.42 (0.98–2.08) 1.14 (1.02–1.28) 0.93 (0.69–1.25) 1.67 (1.25–2.22)
East Midlands 1.13 (0.98–1.31) 1.34 (0.92–1.96) 1.60 (1.05–2.45) 1.15 (1.01–1.30) 1.04 (0.75–1.43) 1.61 (1.15–2.25)
West Midlands 1.06 (0.92–1.22) 1.64 (1.05–2.55) 1.14 (0.74–1.75) 1.34 (1.19–1.51) 1.05 (0.71–1.54) 1.40 (1.01–1.94)
Yorkshire & Humber 1.06 (0.93–1.23) 1.38 (0.94–2.03) 1.60 (1.00–2.57) 0.97 (0.86–1.10) 1.28 (0.92–1.79) 1.59 (1.09–2.32)
North West 0.98 (0.86–1.12) 1.61 (1.08–2.40) 1.80 (1.10–2.94) 1.04 (0.93–1.16) 1.47 (1.04–2.10) 1.73 (1.16–2.59)
North East 1.20 (1.03–1.41) 1.51 (0.98–2.31) 1.29 (0.63–2.66) 1.00 (0.87–1.16) 1.55 (1.04–2.30) 1.78 (0.99–3.19)
Between-area variation
 Variance component 0.088*** 0.030 0.140** 0.057*** 0.068* 0.086*
 Change in variance (%) −0.02 −0.2 +0.1 −0.2 −0.1 −0.1

p < 0.10;

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001.

a

Models are adjusted for individuals’ characteristics.

b

Models are adjusted for individuals’ characteristics and for area-level deprivation.