Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 9;11:160. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0516-1

Table 5.

Effect on clinical performance measured by 11 care processes and six patient outcomes (primary outcome): complete case analysis including correction for case mix

Care processes and patient outcomes Type Control group Intervention group P value N (centres) Missing values
Crude baseline performance Crude follow-up performance Adjusted performance trend [OR (95% CI)] Crude baseline performance Crude follow-up performance Adjusted performance trend [OR (95% CI)]
Psychosocial rehabilitation (study group A)
 1. Complete data on psychological functioning Process 67.1% (425/633) 70.4% (2703/3842) 0.56 (0.25 to 1.25) 86.8% (1474/1698) 85.6% (5495/6420) 0.82 (0.31 to 2.17) 0.690 12,593 (18) 0 (0%)
 2. Complete data on social functioning Process 20.2% (128/633) 17.3% (666/3842) 0.14 (0.01 to 1.91) 56.2% (955/1698) 56.2% (3608/6420) 0.12 (0.01 to 1.95) 0.131 12,593 (18) 0 (0%)
 3. Complete data on lifestyle factors Process 83.3% (527/633) 86.0% (3304/3842) 0.90 (0.45 to 1.83) 86.3% (1465/1698) 80.7% (5180/6420) 0.79 (0.32 to 1.98) 0.619 12,593 (18) 0 (0%)
 4. Disease specific education completeda Process 36.3% (61/168) 46.5% (451/970) 0.59 (0.44 to 0.77) 48.9% (149/305) 69.4% (738/1064) 0.39 (0.26 to 0.60) 0 2507 (10) 1589 (38.8%)
 5. Lifestyle modification programme completeda Process 51.4% (19/37) 42.7% (108/253) 0.63 (0.17 to 2.42) 21.3% (61/286) 33.3% (235/706) 1.24 (0.19 to 8.01) 0.819 1282 (9) 1541 (54.6%)
 6. Improved quality of live after CR Outcome 47.0% (70/149) 48.8% (471/966) 1 (0.76 to 1.33) 46.6% (275/590) 49.0% (1182/2412) 0.96 (0.69 to 1.33) 0.793 4117 (17) 8476 (67.3%)
 7. Successful smoking cessation Outcome 63.0% (63/100) 58.3% (277/475) 0.91 (0.65 to 1.29) 54.1% (119/220) 58.5% (424/725) 0.84 (0.56 to 1.26) 0.392 1520 (17) 11,073 (87.9%)
 8. Patients receive a discharge letter with remaining lifestyle goals Process 9.1% (24/263) 17.8% (209/1173) 5.35 (0.58 to 49.38) 15.5% (161/1037) 26.7% (1004/3755) 2.06 (0.13 to 31.63) 0.609 6228 (18) 6365 (50.5%)
Physical rehabilitation (study group B)
 9. Complete data on physical functioning Process 56.0% (950/1698) 64.1% (4118/6420) 1.66 (0.90 to 3.05) 57.8% (366/633) 67.8% (2605/3842) 0.97 (0.35 to 2.73) 0.956 12,593 (18) 0 (0%)
 10. Complete data concerning cardiovascular risk factors Process 53.5% (909/1698) 48.6% (3123/6420) 1.13 (0.76 to 1.70) 54.8% (347/633) 62.9% (2415/3842) 0.86 (0.45 to 1.65) 0.657 12,593 (18) 0 (0%)
 11. Exercise training completeda Process 55.0% (364/662) 50.2% (1124/2239) 1.17 (0.49 to 2.77) 75.0% (3/4) NA (0/0) 0 (0 to Inf) 1 2905 (9) 2929 (50.2%)
 12. Relaxation and stress management training completeda Process 35.0% (143/409) 51.4% (721/1404) 0.40 (0.09 to 1.72) 40.0% (6/15) 32.7% (145/443) 3.56 (0.16 to 79.38) 0.418 2271 (11) 518 (18.6%)
 13. Cardiovascular risk factors evaluated at discharge Process 12.1% (156/1286) 8.8% (360/4085) 0.51 (0.10 to 2.66) 48.7% (218/448) 41.1% (970/2359) 0.49 (0.04 to 5.46) 0.567 8178 (18) 4415 (35.1%)
 14. Improvement in exercise capacity Outcome 50.8% (199/392) 59.5% (966/1624) 1.14 (0.95 to 1.36) 57.1% (96/168) 51.0% (490/960) 1.22 (0.89 to 1.68) 0.224 3144 (12) 9449 (75.0%)
 15. Successful work resumption Outcome 65.2% (204/313) 59.8% (539/901) 1.07 (0.80 to 1.44) 80.4% (86/107) 81.1% (456/562) 0.86 (0.51 to 1.46) 0.577 1883 (17) 10,710 (85.1%)
 16. Moderately active lifestyle norm met at discharge Outcome 27.3% (229/839) 32.0% (781/2439) 1.45 (0.98 to 2.13) 75.9% (271/357) 75.7% (1249/1650) 1.26 (0.69 to 2.33) 0.457 5285 (17) 7308 (58.0%)
 17. Vigorously active lifestyle norm met at discharge Outcome 9.2% (77/834) 19.2% (467/2438) 1.36 (1.04 to 1.79) 21.7% (74/341) 21.8% (354/1623) 1.32 (0.92 to 1.90) 0.129 5236 (17) 7357 (58.4%)

Baseline period: first 3 months of study period; follow-up period: complete study period minus the baseline period. Performance trends: odds ratios associated with a 1-year study follow-up, adjusted for patients’ age, gender, indication for CR, and centres’ type and size. P value: probability of trends being similar in intervention and control group

Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, CR cardiac rehabilitation, OR odds ratio, NA not applicable

We excluded centres with incomplete data for this indicator. The number of centres and patients included in the analyses was therefore as follows: indicator 4: 12 centres, 11,174 patients; indicator 5: 15 centres, 12,649 patients; indicator 11: 16 centres, 12,915 patients; and indicator 12: 15 centres, 11,324 patients