Skip to main content
. 2016 Summer;15(3):379–391.

Table 8.

Prediction result on artificial sample and commercial samples obtained with PLS1, PCR and HLA methods for theophylline. Concentration values are expressed as mgL−1.




Predicted

Sample No. Actual PLS1 PCR HLA
Art 1a 3.00 2.99±0.09 (99.67) b 2.99±0.07 (99.67) 3.07±0.06 (102.33)
Art 2 4.00 4.14±0.13 (103.50) 4.05±0.08 (101.25) 4.14±0.08 (103.50)
Art 3 6.00 6.02±0.06 (100.33) 6.01±0.05 (100.16) 6.04±0.05 (100.67)
Art 4 8.00 8.07±0.08 (100.87) 8.02±0.06 (100.25) 7.95±0.07 (99.37)
Art 5 9.00 9.06±0.09 (100.67) 9.05±0.08 (100.55) 9.13± 0.09 (101.44)
Art 6 0.00 –0.05±0.06 (–) −0.05±0.05 (–) −0.04±0.05 (–)
Art 7 8.00 8.12±0.10 (101.50) 8.07±0.09 (100.87) 7.92±0.08 (99.00)
Art 8
Unk 1a
Unk 2
Unk 3
Unk 4
Unk 5
0.00
10.00
12.00
13.00
12.00
13.00
–0.06±0.06 (–)
9.73±0.08 (97.30)
12.28±0.09 (102.33)
13.17±0.09 (102.57)
12.33±0.10 (102.75)
13.44±0.12 (103.38)
−0.07± 0.06 (−)
10.30±0.06 (103.00)
12.25±0.12 (102.08)
13.15±0.13 (101.15)
12.31±0.10 (102.58)
13.39±0.11 (103.00)
−0.05±0.07 (–)
10.38±0.12 (103.80)
12.33±0.11 (102.75)
13.23±0.10 (101.76)
12.42±0.09 (103.50)
13.47±0.13 (103.61)
x̅ 101.33 101.32 101.97
a

Art is artificial samples and Unk is unknown samples.

b

The reported values of standard deviations (±S.D.) are obtained from four replicates. Recovery percentages are shown in parentheses.