Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 9;19(1):21136. doi: 10.7448/IAS.19.1.21136

Table 1.

Subject demographics

Subject characteristics Neutralizers Low-neutralizers Non-neutralizers Statistics p-value Total
Subjects (n) 14 18 33 65
Age range min-max (years) 26–64 30–67 31–67 26–67
Average age (years±SD) 47±11 52±10 50±9 One-way ANOVA p=0.43 50±9
Male (n, %) 12, 86% 16, 89% 27, 82% Chi-square p=0.37 55, 85%
Race/ethnicity (n, %)
 African American 7, 50% 5, 28% 7, 21% 19, 29%
 Asian 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
 Caucasians 6, 43% 13, 72% 24, 73% Chi-square p=0.13 43, 66%
 Hispanic 0, 0% 0, 0% 2, 6% 2, 3%
 Other/unknown 1, 7% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 2%
Neutralization breadth (average, range) 7.9, 5–11 2.0, 1–4 0.0,0 B B 2, 0–11
ART naïve (n, %) 7, 50% 12, 67% 18, 55% Chi-square p=0.28 37, 57%
Time since diagnosis (years) 18 19 16 One-way ANOVA p=0.93 17.4
CD4 count (cells/µl) 737 659 796 Kruskal–Wallis p=0.5 761
Protective HLA-B genotype (n, %)
 All subjects (n=65) B*27 ∣ B*57 4, 29% 7, 39% 19, 58% Chi-square p=0.11 30, 46%
 VC only (n=41) B*27 ∣ B*57 4, 31% 4, 33% 8, 50% Chi-square p=0.5 16, 39%
Median viral load (copies/ml)
 All subjects, EC & VC (n=65) 400 87 67 Kruskal–Wallis p<0.010 141
 VC only (n=41) 400 304 205 Kruskal–Wallis p=0.5 321
Viral control category (n, %)
 Elite 1, 7% 6, 33% 17, 52% Chi-square p<0.050 24, 37%
 Viremic 13, 93% 12, 67% 16, 48% 41, 63%

p values in bold indicate significant differences.