Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 28;113(43):721–728. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0721

Table 1. Comparison of risk estimators in published cohort studies of cancer risk following computed tomography (CT) in childhood.

Country (study) Year Study population Risk estimator Comparison Leukemia Brain/CNS tumors
Cases Risk estimator [95% CI] Cases Risk estimator [95% CI]
Great Britain (9) 2012 178 604 RR 0–5 versus 50 mGy 74 3.18
[1.46; 6.94]
135 2.82
[1.33; 6.03]
Australia (10) 2013 10 939 680 IRR CT versus no CT 211 1.23
[1.08; 1.41]
283 2.13
[1.88; 2.41]
Taiwan (11) 2014 122 086 HR Head CT versus no CT 17 1.9
[0.82; 4.40]
30 2.56
[1.44; 4.45]
France (12) 2015 67 274 RR* CT versus no CT 25 1.57
[0.21; 2.93]
27 1.22
[0.84; 1.61]
Germany (13) 2015 44 584 SIR CT versus general population 12 1.72
[0.89; 3.01]
7 1.35
[0.54; 2.78]
Great Britain (14) 2016 178 254 RR* CT versus no CT 67 1.20
[0.89; 1.89]
107 1.10
[1.02; 1.26]

*Our calculations (18);

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; IRR, incidence rate ratio; RR, relative risk; SIR, standardized incidence ratio