Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 18;113(49):E7880–E7889. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610978113

Table 2.

Comparison of selection profiles, in vitro assay potencies, and SPR-binding constants for InhA inhibitors

Compound Series Profile class InhA NAD+ assay IC50, µM InhA NADH assay IC50, µM InhA NAD+ SPR Kd, µM InhA NADH SPR Kd, µM InhA Apo SPR Kd, µM
11 11 1 0.389 ± 0.007 0.168 (n = 1) NT NT NT
10a 10 2 0.038 ± 0.006 0.198 ± 0.009 0.26 ± 0.12 5 ± 1.20 12.4 ± 1.41
12 12 2 0.682 ± 0.207 6.838 ± 0.175 NT NT NT
2a* 1–3 3 0.060 ± 0.004 0.057 ± 0.006 46.7 ± 11.6 0.094 ± 0.06 >100
13 13 3 0.791 ± 0.008 0.609 ± 0.114 NT NT NT
8a* 8 and 9 3 NT 0.130 ± 0.006 49 ± 2.90 0.055 ± 0.03 >100
6a* 6 and 7 3 NT 5.917 ± 1.22 >100 36.8 ± 3.25 >100
4a* 4 and 5 3 NT 0.297 ± 0.053 >100 0.25 ± 0.11 >100
1a* 1–3 3 NT 0.065 ± 0.008 13.4 ± 4.30 0.34 ± 0.22 >100
14 14 3 NT 5.568 ± 0.777 >100 6.3 >100

Profile classes: 1, enriched only in the presence of apo InhA; 2, enriched only in the presence of the InhA:NAD+ complex; 3, enriched only in the presence of the InhA:NADH complex but not in presence of small molecule. NT, not tested. Chemical structures for compounds 11–14 are given in Fig. S1.

*

WT InhA cocrystal structures reported herein.