Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep;54(3):304–316. doi: 10.17113/ftb.54.03.16.4413

Table 2. Encapsulation efficiency (EE) of different herb and spice extracts in liposomes expressed in percentage of entrapped phenolic components.

Plant extract EE/%
aqueous
extract
alcohol
extract
citric acid extract
wormwood (3.7±0.1)a (25.6±0.8)c (2.8±0.4)a
thyme (45.2±2.0)e (33.6±0.8)d (17.2±0.8)d
coneflower (26.6±0.8)c (25.5±0.8)c (9.1±0.8)b
liquorice (60.2±4.8)g (54.3±1.2)f (18.3±0.7)d
pot marigold (37.5±1.1)de (34.4±0.6)d (26.9±0.9)e
sea buckthorn (20.5±1.1)b (12.9±0.5)b (13.1±0.4)c
sage (69.7±2.6)h (32.0±0.8)d (42.4±0.9)f
rosemary (35.3±0.8)d (46.5±1.8)e (32.1±0.5)e
common nettle (48.5±3.3)f (33.3±1.7)d (61.2±3.4)h
clove (2.5±0.2)a (55.3±5.7)f (51.1±2.8)g
lavender (71.9±5.4)h (11.2±0.8)b (31.9±1.9)e
chamomile (77.0±6.8)h (4.5±0.1)a (2.0±0.1)a
elderberry (51.7±5.2)f (6.8±0.4)a (42.4±0.9)f
plantago (27.9±2.1)c (15.4±0.8)b (22.7±0.8)de
marjoram (37.7±0.9)de (42.5±0.9)e (33.9±0.6)e
St. John´s wort (39.5±0.9)e (35.6±0.8)d (28.9±0.9)e
ginger (28.9±1.3)c (11.5±0.4)b (8.0±0.3)b
garlic (93.2±8.2)i (15.2±0.4)b (9.6±0.3)b

Results are presented as mean value±standard deviation.
Values with the same letter in the same column are not statistically different (p>0.05)