Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 18;24(4):395–406. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2016.1222275

Table 4.

Potential risk factors (“parameters”) with odds ratios based on the multiple-regression analysis concerning to back pain.

Parameter N p-value Odds ratio Confidence intervals (95%)
lower upper
Female vs. male 269 vs. 841 *0.019 1.48 1.05 2.08
Age groups 1110 *0.005      
U19 vs. U15 299 vs. 348 *0.004 1.84 1.21 2.80
U17 vs. U15 463 vs. 348 *0.003 1.66 1.19 2.31
U19 vs. U17 299 vs. 463 0.052 1.11 0.81 1.55
Body mass index (BMI) 1110 0.27 0.97 0.91 1.03
Training experience 1110 0.17 1.04 0.98 1.10
Injuries (overall) 1851 0.80 0.95 0.64 1.01
Spine (yes vs. no) 154 vs. 956 *0.003 1.74 1.21 2.52
Hip/groin (yes vs. no) 245 vs. 865 *0.039 1.40 1.02 1.93
Upper leg (yes vs. no) 298 vs. 812 0.21 1.22 0.89 1.67
Knee (yes vs. no) 381 vs. 729 0.082 1.29 0.97 1.71
Lower leg (yes vs. no) 107 vs. 1003 0.54 1.15 0.74 1.79
Ankle (yes vs. no) 376 vs. 734 0.072 1.30 0.98 1.73
Foot/toe (yes vs. no) 290 vs. 820 0.41 1.13 0.84 1.53
Playing surface 1110 *0.013      
Natural vs. hard court/indoor 825 vs. 16 0.46 1.42 0.56 3.63
Artificial vs. hard court/indoor 270 vs. 16 0.85 0.91 0.35 2.39
Natural vs. artificial turf 825 vs. 270 *0.004 1.56 1.15 2.10
Position 1110 0.21      
Goalkeeper vs. striker 89 vs. 209 0.066 1.65 0.97 2.80
Goalkeeper vs. midfielder 89 vs. 443 *0.036 1.70 1.04 2.78
Goalkeeper vs. defender 89 vs. 369 0.088 1.54 0.94 2.52
Striker vs. midfielder 209 vs. 369 0.87 1.03 0.72 1.47
Striker vs. defender 209 vs. 369 0.706 0.93 0.65 1.34
Midfielder vs. defender 443 vs. 369 0.58 0.92 0.68 1.24
Weekly training load 1110 0.65      
≤3 h vs. ≥6 h 108 vs. 713 0.424 0.81 0.51 1.31

*Significance p < 0.05; additionally the confidence interval (lower to upper limit) of the OR is given to evaluate the influence; n = 1110.