Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec;39(12):799–812. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.10.004

Table I.

Comparison of Current and Existing Tinnitus Models in Terms of Ability to Address Paradoxes in Tinnitus Researcha

Improvement by auditory nerve section Exacerbation by auditory nerve section Occurrence of hearing loss without tinnitus Onset of tinnitus later than hearing loss Lack of spontaneous neural correlates in patients versus matched controls Bidirectional correlation of tinnitus intensity with gamma power
Peripheral Yes No Potentially Potentially No No
Central gain No Yes Potentially Potentially No No
Neural synchrony No Yes Yes Yes No No
Thalamocortical dysrhythmia No Yes Potentially Potentially No No
Frontostriatal gating No Yes Yes Potentially No No
Filling in No Yes No Potentially Potentially No
Global workspace N/A N/A Yes Yes Potentially No
Precision/predictive coding model Yes:
(i) If precursor origin is peripheral
(ii) Deafferentation
reduces sensory
precision
Yes:
(i) If precursor origin is central (increased
central gain)
(ii) Deafferentation
removes constraints
on sensory precision
Yes:
Adaptive
attenuation of
sensory
precision
Yes:
Failure to
attenuate
sensory
precision, which
is influenced by
many factors,
including stress
Yes:
Neural correlates of
PWPE reflect
predisposition to
tinnitus rather
than to the percept itself
Yes:
Hierarchical
dissociation of
perceptual
inference (tinnitus)
and concomitant
PWPE (gamma)
a

Yes, addresses paradox; No, cannot address paradox; Potentially, does not presently address paradox but could do so with amendment; N/A, not applicable.