Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 12.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2016 Jul 15;46:180–191. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.07.005

Table 10.

The performance comparison of our proposed method (oRF-L1-soft-long) and TGL and cFSGL used in Zhou et al. (2013) on the prediction of MMSE at the 12th, 24th, 36th and 48th month, in terms of rMSE and the overall wR

Method wR rMSE
M12 M24 M36 M48
TGL 0.755 2.923 3.363 3.768 3.631
cFSGL 0.796 2.762 3.000 3.265 2.871
oRF-L1-soft-long 0.825 2.352 3.069 2.871 2.362

The best results are shown in bold.

Key: cFSGL, convex Fused Sparse Group Lasso; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; rMSE, root mean square error; TGL, Temporal Group Lasso; wR, weighted Pearson’s correlation coefficient.