Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov;79:104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.06.005

Table 2.

Characteristics of analyzed RCD study sample

Characteristics Studies, n (%)
Studies (n) 124 (100)
Number of routine data sources
 Single data source 74 (59.7)
 2 data sources 24 (19.4)
 3 data sources 9 (7.3)
 4 data sources 9 (7.3)
 5 or more data sources 8 (6.5)
Type of routine dataa
 Administrative data, not health 26 (21.0)
 Administrative health data 40 (32.3)
 Prescription data 13 (10.5)
 Other administrative health data 37 (29.8)
 EMR/EHR 19 (15.3)
 Registry 70 (56.5)
 Disease registry 64 (51.6)
 Device registry 7 (5.6)
 Other 14 (12.1)
Area of research
 Clinical/medical 25 (20.2)
 Epidemiology 91 (73.4)
 Other or both areas 8 (6.5)
Statistical analyses
 Multivariable analysesa 81 (65.3)
 Propensity scoresa 5 (4.0)
 Other or purely descriptive 43 (34.7)
Type of condition
 Cancer 35 (28.2)
 Cardiovascular disease 17 (13.7)
 Endocrinology 6 (4.8)
 Nephrology 3 (2.4)
 Neurology/psychiatry 10 (8.1)
 Other or healthy participants 53 (42.7)
Citation impact
 IF 2012 (median, IQR) (range), n = 118 3.12 (2.16; 4.16) [0.15–25.12]
 Citations (median, IQR) (range), n = 124 5 (2; 10.5) [0–68]
Endorsement of STROBE 17 (13.7)

Abbreviations: STROBE, STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology; RCD, routinely collected data; EMR, electronic medical record; EHR, electronic health record; IF, impact factor; IQR, interquartile range.

Citations up to February 2015 as of ISI Web of Knowledge (all databases); STROBE endorsement as of March 2016.

a

More than one category may apply.