Skip to main content
. 2004 Aug 24;2:31. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-31

Table 3.

Predictors of the extent of coronary artery calcium, as measured by log-transformed non-zero coronary artery calcium scores, in three linear regression models.

Model approach Model results
Predictors Coefficients (95% CI) Corresponding percent increase in natural CAC scores* p-values Adjusted R2

Age and sex only†
 - Age, per 10 years 0.68 (0.63 – 0.73) 97% (88 – 107%) <0.001 0.14
 - Male sex 0.72 (0.61 – 0.82) 105% (85 – 127%) <0.001
All CHD risk factors†
 - Age, per 10 years 0.69 (0.64 – 0.73) 99% (89 – 109%) <0.001 0.17
 - Male sex 0.73 (0.63 – 0.83) 108% (88 – 130%) <0.001
 - Hypertension 0.23 (0.14 – 0.32) 26% (14 – 38%) <0.001
 - Diabetes mellitus 0.48 (0.33 – 0.62) 61% (40 – 88%) <0.001
 - High cholesterol 0.15 (0.05 – 0.24) 16% (4.8 – 28%) 0.004
 - Smoking 0.45 (0.35 – 0.54) 56% (42 – 71%) <0.001
Estimated 10-year risk of CHD‡, only†
 - 10-year risk, per 5% increase 0.34 (0.31 – 0.36) 40% (36 – 44%) <0.001 0.11

* – The percent increase in the natural (non-transformed) CAC score associated with each predictor is calculated by exponentiating the regression coefficient from the linear regression model (when the dependent variable is log-transformed), and subtracting 1.

† – Intercepts were -0.181, -0.705, and 3.17 for each model respectively. The standard deviations of the residuals were 1.682, 1.653, and 1.707.

‡ – 10-year risk of CHD estimated according to Framingham equations [16]; for assumptions used, see Methods.

CAC – Coronary artery calcium; CI – Confidence interval; CHD – Coronary heart disease.