Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 3;4(4):156–159. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2016.07.005

Table 2.

Multiple regression analysis for PSA, testosterone, prostate volume and PSA density, in relation to DM, studying BMI as a confounding factor

B SE t p 95% CI
Lower Upper
PSA DM 0.743 0.155 4.795 < 0.001 0.439 1.048
BMI −0.166 0.016 10.359 < 0.001 −0.197 −0.134
F = 87.977*, P < 0.001*, R = 0.511, R2 = 0.261
Testosterone DM 0.400 0.165 2.420* 0.016 0.075 0.724
BMI −0.210 0.017 12.305* < 0.001 −0.243 −0.176
F = 96.237*, P < 0.001*, R = 0.528, R2 = 0.279
Prostate volume DM 4.629 1.633 2.835* 0.005 1.420 7.837
BMI 3.011 0.168 17.883* < 0.001 2.680 3.341
F = 136.430*, P < 0.001*, R = 0.629, R2 = 0.396
PSA density DM 0.020 0.004 4.853* < 0.001 0.012 0.028
BMI −0.006 0.000 14.784* < 0.001 −0.007 −0.005
F = 156.697*, P < 0.001*, R = 0.621, R2 = 0.386

BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; SE, standard error.