Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 23;12:e1–e9. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.02.012

Table 1.

Univariate (U) and multivariate (M) analysis of correlation between textural features and clinical scores in the More affected caudate.

Parameters p-values
UPDRS III
DD-diag.
DD-sympt.
MoCA
U M U M U M U M
Conventional 0.94a 0.88a 0.34a 0.96a
Entropy 0.0092 0.0027 0.0053
Homogeneity < 0.001 < 0.001 0.019b 0.019
Agreement < 0.001 < 0.001 0.0012 0.029b
Dissimilarity 0.0022 < 0.001 0.021b
Contrast 0.0085 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.040b
Energy 0.031b 0.037b 0.041b
MaxProbability 0.029b
SumMean 0.029b
Correlation 0.0021
Variance < 0.001 < 0.001
Cluster Tend. 0.0034
Age 0.012

Notes:

(1) Two other Haralick features (cluster shade, inverse variance) were also included in the analyses, but had insignificant contributions, and thus are not shown in this table.

(2) We report p-values in the table, while those in univariate analysis that become non-significant after correction for multiple testing (FDR) are indicated using b (see below).

a

p-Values for conventional normalized mean uptake were insignificant.

b

p-Value < 0.05 but not significant after correction for multiple testing (p-values > 0.05 are not shown except for conventional analysis).