Table 1.
Algorithm | mCERADSOT | mCERADmode | CERAD |
---|---|---|---|
Regions assessed | MFL, MTG, STG, IPL, ACG, PCG, PRC, PVC | MFL, MTG, STG, IPL | MFL, MTG, STG, IPL |
Regional assessments | 8 regional averages (mean) of 30 intra-regional numerica assessments (each 0 ≤ x ≤ 3) | 4 regional averages (mode) of 30 intra-regional categorical assessments (none, sparse, moderate, frequent) | 1 global assessment from region of highest involvement (none, sparse, moderate, frequent) |
Case dichotomy | Any region >1.5 is abnormal | Any region = moderate or frequent is abnormal | moderate or frequent is abnormal |
MFL midfrontal lobe, MTG middle temporal gyrus, STG superior temporal gyrus, IPL inferior parietal lobe, ACG anterior cingulate gyrus, PCG posterior cingulate gyrus, PRC Precuneus, PVC primary visual cortex
aEach assessment was recorded as 0 = none (no plaques per 100x field of view), 1 = sparse (1-5 plaques), 2 = moderate (6-19 plaques) or 3 = frequent (20 or more plaques). A total of 240 cortical assessments were recorded for each case