Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 19;114(2):171–176. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.451

Table 1. Patient characteristics by randomisation status.

  No intervention, N (%) Intervention, N (%) Test
  11 445 (50.1) 11 383 (49.9)  
Mean IMD score (range)a 27.4 (2.2–82.0) 27.4 (2.2–81.6) Wilcoxon's rank-sum test z=0.01, P>z=0.99
IMD, N (%)b
1st quintile 3392 (29.8) 3392 (30.0) χ2 for trend z=0.33, P>z=0.74
2nd quintile 2486 (21.9) 2384 (21.1)  
3rd quintile 1878 (16.5) 1880 (16.6)  
4th quintile 2336 (20.5) 2409 (21.3)  
5th quintile 1279 (11.3) 1242 (11.0)  
Mean age at first offered appointment (years) 59.0 (50–70) 59.0 (50–70) Wilcoxon's rank-sum test z=0.36, P>z=0.72
Age group (years), N (%)
<60 6179 (54.0) 6119 (53.8) Pearson's χ2 (1)=0.12, P=0.72
60+ 5266 (46.0) 5264 (46.2)  
Screen type
Prevalent 3110 (27.2) 3154 (27.7) Pearson's χ2 (1)=0.82, P=0.37
Incident 8335 (72.8) 8229 (72.3)  
Centre
Bolton 5745 (50.2) 5738 (50.4) Pearson's χ2 (2)=0.30, P=0.86
Wigan 2835 (24.8) 2784 (24.5)  
Liverpool 2865 (25.0) 2861 (25.1)  

Abbreviation: IMD=index of multiple deprivation.

a

Higher score=lower socioeconomic status.

b

1st quintile=lowest socioeconomic class.