Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 19;114(2):171–176. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.451

Table 4. Results for women aged 50–52 yearsa and 53–70 yearsb.

    Attenders/total (%)
 
  End point No intervention Intervention OR (95% CI)
screen
Prevalent round for women aged 50–52 years inclusive Days from FOA      
  30 1050/1772 (59.3) 1157/1814 (63.8) 1.21 (1.05–1.39)
  90 1152/1772 (65.0) 1266/1814 (69.8) 1.24 (1.08–1.43)
  Days from episode opened      
  180 1164/1772 (65.7) 1280/1814 (70.6) 1.25 (1.08–1.44)
         
Incident round for women aged 53–70 years inclusive who previously attended Days from FOA      
  30 5313/7157 (74.30 5590/7120 (78.5) 1.26 (1.17–1.37)
  90 5884/7157 (49.3) 6057/7120 (85.1) 1.23 (1.12–1.35)
  Days from episode opened      
  180 5964/7157 (83.3) 6106/7120 (85.8) 1.20 (1.09–1.32)
         
Incident round for women aged 53–70 years inclusive who did not previously attended Days from FOA      
  30 36/90 (40.0) 37/83 (44.6) 1.20 (0.65–2.21)
  90 47/90 (52.2) 43/83 (47.8) 0.98 (0.54–1.79)
  Days from episode opened      
  180 48/90 (53.2) 44/83 (47.8) 0.98 (0.54–1.80)

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; FOA=first offered appointment; OR=odds ratio.

a

Inclusive for prevalent screen.

b

Inclusive for incident screen by previously did and did not attend.