Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2016 Aug 6;107:253–259. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.008

Table 4.

Adjusted mean scores of Profile of Mood States (POMS) subscale and Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) stratified by Healthy (N = 29) or Overweight/obese (N = 53) participants observed on both high-glycemic load (HGL) diet and a low-glycemic load (LGL) diet in a crossover design study. The models were adjusted for baseline POMS and CES-D scores, diet type, sex, body fat classification (based on DXA), diet order, and feeding period. Reported as least square means with standard error, LSmean (SE).

Overweight/Obese Healthy Weight


HGL LGL Difference
between diet
types
P value HGL LGL Difference
between diet
types
P value
POMS
subscales
LSmean ±SE LSmean ±SE LSmean ±SE POMS
subscales
LSmean ±SE LSmean ±SE LSmean ±SE
Vigor/
Activity
8.07(0.56) 8.88(0.57) −0.80(0.65) 0.22 Vigor/
Activity
9.03(0.60) 10.99(0.59) −1.96(0.70) 0.001
Fatique/
Inertia
5.64(0.57) 4.51(0.59) 1.13(0.72) 0.13 Fatique/
Inertia
4.77(0.64) 3.75(0.63) 1.02(0.75) 0.19
Total
Mood
Disturbance
11.70(2.13) 8.67(2.17) 3.03(2.36) 0.21 Total
Mood
Disturbance
7.10(2.12) 2.68(2.09) 4.42(2.81) 0.13
Negative
Affect
9.88(1.27) 9.47(1.30) 0.41(1.41) 0.77 Negative
Affect
7.60(1.10) 6.84(1.07) 0.76(1.49) 0.62
CES-D 3.17(0.29) 2.41(0.29) 0.76(0.31) 0.02 CES-D 2.13 (0.30) 1.33(0.29) 0.79(0.41) 0.07