Table 4.
Twin Similarity in Temperament Profile Membership and Factor Score
| Twin Profile Concordance | MZ | DZ | |||||
|
| |||||||
| Regulated, Typical Reactive | Twin 2 | Twin 2 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
| Twin 1 | 0 | 195 (67%) | 6 (2%) | 0 | 265 (56%) | 38 (8%) | |
| 1 | 7 (2%) | 83 (29%) | 1 | 41(9%) | 132 (28%) | ||
|
| |||||||
| Well-Regulated, Positive Reactive | Twin 2 | Twin 2 | |||||
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||
| Twin 1 | 0 | 169 (58%) | 21 (7%) | 0 | 282 (59%) | 59 (12%) | |
| 1 | 18 (6%) | 83 (29%) | 1 | 66 (14%) | 69 (15%) | ||
|
| |||||||
| Regulated, Surgent | Twin 2 | Twin 2 | |||||
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||
| Twin 1 | 0 | 206 (71%) | 18 (6%) | 0 | 338 (71%) | 57 (12%) | |
| 1 | 19 (7%) | 48 (16%) | 1 | 59 (12%) | 22 (5%) | ||
|
| |||||||
| Dysregulated, Negative Reactive | Twin 2 | Twin 2 | |||||
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||
| Twin 1 | 0 | 252 (87%) | 6 (2%) | 0 | 343 (72%) | 46 (10%) | |
| 1 | 7 (2%) | 26 (9%) | 1 | 34 (7%) | 53 (11%) | ||
|
| |||||||
| Twin Intraclass Correlations for Factor Score | .81 | .40 | |||||
Note: MZ = monozygotic, DZ=dizygotic.