Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Aug 26;65:224–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.08.027

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Comparison between the results of mineral strain predicted using the cohesive FE model and obtained from synchrotron X-ray experiments (Samuel et al., 2016). The mineral strain showed a linear trend in compression, but nonlinear pattern in tension before yield point. The mineral strain showed a greater value in compression compared to tension. The mineral strain dropped very fast with dry interface in both tension and compression after yield point.