Table 3.
Association between study site characteristics and the risk of diabetes: crude and adjusted models.
| Incidence (95%CI) | Crude model | Adjusted modela | Adjusted modelb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| per 100 person-years | RR (95%CI) | RR (95%CI) | RR (95%CI) | |
| Study setting | ||||
| Lima | 1.96 (1.46–2.62) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| Urban Puno | 2.50 (1.66–3.76) | 1.19 (0.73–1.93) | 1.32 (0.75–2.30) | 1.45 (0.84–2.48) |
| Rural Puno | 1.52 (0.86–2.68) | 0.71 (0.38–1.33) | 1.13 (0.56–2.29) | 1.52 (0.73–3.18) |
| Tumbes | 1.87 (1.37–2.53) | 0.96 (0.64–1.45) | 1.02 (0.66–1.58) | 0.86 (0.54–1.36) |
| Setting altitude | ||||
| Low | 1.91 (1.55–2.36) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| High | 2.05 (1.47–2.85) | 1.20 (0.82–1.75) | 1.23 (0.79–1.91) | 1.58 (1.01–2.48) |
a
The model was adjusted by sex, age, education level, and socioeconomic status.
b
Model adjusted for sex, age, education level, socioeconomic status, family history of diabetes, daily smoking, hazardous drinking, TV watching for 2+ hours per day, transport-related physical inactivity, fruits and vegetables consumption, body mass index, and metabolic syndrome.