Table 4.
Presumed connectivity between cones and HCs as proposed by Connaughton and Nelson (2010)
L1 | L2 | BHC | THC Blue | THC UV | TetraHC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L cone | 52% | 76% | 0% | 11% | 13% | 22% |
M cone | 48% | 22% | 57% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
S cone | 0% | 0% | 40% | 73% | 3% | 78% |
UV cone | 0% | 2% | 2% | 16% | 85% | 0% |
These percentages are deduced from the results of the model of Connaughton and Nelson (2010), representing the relative contributions of each cone type to hyperpolarizing responses.