Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 5;116(6):2799–2814. doi: 10.1152/jn.00449.2016

Table 4.

Presumed connectivity between cones and HCs as proposed by Connaughton and Nelson (2010)

L1 L2 BHC THC Blue THC UV TetraHC
L cone 52% 76% 0% 11% 13% 22%
M cone 48% 22% 57% 0% 0% 0%
S cone 0% 0% 40% 73% 3% 78%
UV cone 0% 2% 2% 16% 85% 0%

These percentages are deduced from the results of the model of Connaughton and Nelson (2010), representing the relative contributions of each cone type to hyperpolarizing responses.