Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 30;2016:1092819. doi: 10.1155/2016/1092819

Table 3.

Ordinal regression model for body dissatisfaction.

Factors Ordered log-odds: B (95% CI) SE P value
<85th % underweight/normal −3.25 (−4.11, −2.38) 0.44 <.001
85th−94th overweight −1.59 (−2.48, −0.70) 0.46 <.001
≥95th obese (reference) 0
Perceived fair to poor diet 0.65 (−.002, 1.30) 0.33 .051
Perceived good to excellent diet (reference) 0
Perceived engagement in physical activity (yes) −0.02 (−0.73, 0.69) 0.36 .953
Perceived engagement in physical activity
(no, reference)
0
Public school 0.46 (−0.27, 1.20) 0.38 .218
Private school (reference) 0
Hours/wk viewing television
 0–2.5 0.52 (−0.31, 1.74) 0.52 .170
 3-4 0.55 (−0.44, 1.54) 0.41 .278
 4.5–8.5 0.74 (−0.21, 1.69) 0.48 .128
 >8.5 (reference) 0
Hours/wk using computer/video
 0–2.5 −0.04 (−1.04, 0.95) 0.51 .929
 3–5 −0.39 (−1.35, 0.58) 0.49 .435
 5.5–17.5 0.49 (−0.47, 1.46) 0.49 .316
 >17.5 (reference) 0

Model fit: χ 2 = 79.4 (11), P < .001; Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.438.