Table 3. Comparison of the analytical performance of the proposed MSPE-UPLC-MS/MS method with other ones for determination of PFCs in surface water sample.
| Analytical methods | Adsorbents | Sorbent amount (mg) | Sample volume (mL) | Enrichment factor | Extraction time (min) | Analytical timea (min) | Linearity ranges (ng L−1) | LODs (ng L−1) | Spike recoveries (%) | RSDs (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSPE-UPLC-MS/MS25 | Fe3O4@SiO2-FBC | 40 | 100 | 100 | 12 | 3.5 | 0.25–25 | 0.01–0.06 | 89.34–111.32 | <9.9 |
| MSPE-HPLC-MS/MS19 | Fe3O4-C18@Chitosan | 100 | 500 | 1000 | 20 | 6.5 | 0.5–50 | 0.05–0.24 | 56–112 | 2–8 |
| MSPE-HPLC-MS/MS17 | Fe3O4-CTAB | 75 | 800 | 1600 | 10 | 6.5 | 0.5–50 | 0.03–0.88 | 66–123 | 1–8 |
| SPE-HPLC-MS/MS13 | Oasis-Wax | 150 | 1000 | 1000 | >300 | >10 | 0.2–50 | <0.1–0.6b | 61–118 | <18 |
| SPE-HPLC-MS/MS15 | Oasis-HLB | 200 | 500 | 500 | >160 | >20 | n. r.c | <0.2–2.0b | 77–137 | n. r.c |
| This work | Fe3O4@SiO2-NH2&F13 | 50 | 500 | 1000 | 30 | 8 | 0.5–100 | 0.029–0.099 | 90.05–106.67 | 3.1–12.6 |
aConfirmed by the time of chromatogram peak appearance of the last target analyte.
bLOQs. The LODs were not given in the References.
cNot reported.