Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 14;6:39082. doi: 10.1038/srep39082

Table 1. Comparison of in vitro and in silico predicted activities of aminoacidic variants in CYP21A2 presumed to be involved in protein stability published since 2014.

Mutation In vitro activity ± SD
In silico activity
Patient’s second mutation (REA%) Patient’s phenotype Reference
17- OHP P Bovine model Human crystal structure
p.P45L 105 ± 10 ND 0.74 1.46 ND SV 21
p.K102R 119.7 ± 25 ND 63.16 ≥100 ND NA 21
p.L122P 1.4 ± 2.1 −1.9 ± 5.2 0.11 0.25 Deletion (0) SW 22
p.R149C 35.8 ± 14.6 47.3 ± 12.9 ≥100 ≥100 p.V281L (60) NC 23
p.M150R 17.7 ± 1.9 4.6 ± 1.9 0.9 4.4 N PB 22
p.A159T 126.6 ± 29.9 ND ≥100 ≥100 N AD 21
p.V211M 99.5 ± 32.4 ND ≥100 ≥100 ND SV/NC 21
p.A265S 90 ± 9 104 ± 15 ≥100 ≥100 N NA 24
p.M283V 16.2 ± 9.3 19 ± 7 41.8 38.14 Deletion (0) NC 23
p.M473I 85 ± 7 66 ± 12 ≥100 64.12 p.V281L (60) NC 24

In silico enzymatic activities were calculated from the fitting of the bovine based model and from the human crystal (Fig. 1) using the estimated ∆∆Gs of each of the mutants (Table S1). In vitro and in silico enzymatic activities are expressed in percentage relative to the wild type protein considered as 100%. In vitro enzymatic activities, patients’ second mutation and phenotypes are those reported in the bibliography. 17-OHP: 17-hydroxyprogesterone. P: Progesterone. REA: Residual enzymatic activity. ND: Not determined. N: Normal; NC. Nonclassical; SV: Simple virilizing; SW: Salt wasting; NA: Not Affected; PB: Premature Pubarche; AD: Addison Disease.