Table 2. In silico predicted residual activity of CYP21A2 stability mutants lacking functional assays.
Variant | Patient’s second mutation (% REA) | Patient’s phenotype | Expected activity of the variant | ∆∆G | In silico activity (%) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p.H38L | NA | NA | ? | −1.64 | 100 | 26 |
p.Y47C | NA | NA | ? | −1.64 | 100 | 27 |
p.Y59N | NA | CL | 0–5 | 2.54 | 4.4 | 28 |
p.V69L | p.[Q318;.R356] (0) pH62L in cis* | SV | 5–60 | 1.47 | 22.5 | 29 |
p.S113Y | p.V281L (60) | NC | 0–60 | 0.79 | 63.3 | 30 |
p.S113F | NA | NA | ? | 1.05 | 42.6 | 20 |
p.Q144P | p.P482fs (ND) | SW | 0 | 0.61 | 83.2 | 29 |
p.F164S | p.I172N (2) | SV | 0–5 | 1.37 | 26.2 | 29 |
p.S165P | p.I172N (2) | NC | 10–60 | 4.94 | 0.1 | 31 |
p.T168N | Chimeric gene (0) | NC | 10–60 | 3.41 | 1.2 | 32 |
p.V211L | NA | N? | ? | −0.91 | 100 | 33 |
p.E238K | NA | 4 SW, 1 NC | 0# | −0.33 | 100 | 34 |
p.V249A | NA | N | 100 | 0.45 | 100 | 35 |
p.L261P | c.290-13A/C>G** (0–2) | SW | 0 | 8.95 | 0.01 | 36 |
p.M283L | p.V281L (60) | NC | 0–60 | −0.3 | 100 | 37 |
p.S301Y | c.290-13A/C>G** (0–2) | NC | 10–60 | 12.31 | 0.00 | 38 |
p.V304E | c.290-13A/C>G** (0–2) | SW | 0 | 2.44 | 5.1 | 29 |
p.V305D | NA | NA | ? | 0.99 | 46.6 | 20 |
p.F306V | NA | NA | ? | 1.87 | 12.2 | 20 |
p.L307V | Deletion (0) | NC | 10–60 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 30 |
p.R316L | p.V281L (60) | NC | 0–60 | 0.03 | 100 | 30 |
p.L317M | c.290-13A/C>G** (0–2) | NC | 10–60 | −0.8 | 100 | 39 |
p.L317V | N | NC§ | ? | 2.42 | 5.3 | 40 |
p.L321P | NA | NA | ? | 9.84 | 0.0 | 20 |
p.G381S | NA | NA | ? | 3.51 | 1.0 | 20 |
p.N387K | p. V281L (60) | NC | 0–60 | 7.55 | 0.0 | 41 |
p.F404S | p.F404S (ND) | SW | 0 | 5.34 | 0.06 | 42 |
p.F404L | p.V281L (60) | NC | 0–60 | 2.51 | 4.6 | 30 |
p.T450P | p.T450P (ND) | SW | 0 | 9.35 | 0.0 | 42 |
p.P459H | p.[ClEx6; Q318X; A391T] (0) | SV | 2–5 | 4.44 | 0.2 | 43 |
p.P459S | Chimeric Gene | SV | 2–5 | 2.68 | 3.6 | 32 |
p.P459L | c.290-13A/C>G** (0–2) | SV | 0–5 | 1.29 | 29.5 | 29 |
In silico predicted activities of mutants lacking functional assays were compared with the expected ones. Expected activity was established considering the residual activity of the mutation on the homologous allele and/or the patient’s phenotype when available. In silico enzymatic activities were calculated from the fitting based on the bovine template using the estimated ∆∆G of each of the variants (Table S1). Activities are expressed relative of the wild type protein (100%). *According to functional assays, p.H62L mutation was classified as a mild mutation. Nevertheless, several alleles were described having another mild mutation in cis with decreased enzymatic activities most likely related to the SV form of the disease50,60. **c.290-13A/C>G mutation creates a new acceptor splice site. Patients bearing this mutation have been described presenting either a SW or a SV phenotype8. #The classification of the expected activity for this variant was based on the fact that 4/5 patients presented a SW phenotype. §The patient described by Byounga et al.40, disclosed a 17-OHP post ACTH value of 6, 67 ng/mL. According to the current inclusion criteria, patients would be classified as presenting a NC form of the disease when the post ACTH test is at least 10 ng/mL61. REA: Residual enzymatic activity. NA: Not available, ND: Not determined; N. Normal; NC. Nonclassical; SV: Simple virilizing; SW: Salt wasting; CL: Classical; N: Normal; ClEx6: Cluster Exon 6 mutations. ?: Insufficient data to estimate the expected enzymatic activity.