Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 14.
Published in final edited form as: Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Dec 4;24(7):1221–1227. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-2002-x

Table 3.

The significance level (p value) obtained from post hoc analyses of the viscoelastic parameters (Table 2) between each experimental group

Group Complex modulus (E*) Storage modulus (E′) Loss modulus (E″)
Premenopausal, no prolapse vs premenopausal prolapsed 0.016 0.098 0.056
Premenopausal, no prolapse vs postmenopausal prolapsed, no HT 0.044 0.048 0.087
Premenopausal, no prolapse vs postmenopausal prolapsed, HT 0.004 0.003 0.015
Premenopausal prolapse vs postmenopausal prolapsed, no HT 0.28 0.61 0.3
Premenopausal prolapse vs postmenopausal prolapsed, HT 0.28 0.093 1
Postmenopausal prolapse, no HT vs postmenopausal prolapsed, HT 0.044 0.041 0.085