Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: Integr Biol (Camb). 2016 Dec 5;8(12):1301–1311. doi: 10.1039/c6ib00108d

Table 1.

Biomimetic approaches to engineering tumors

Advantages Disadvantages
Single and multicellular tumor spheroids Inch et al. (1970)8
Sutherland (1988)9
Helmlinger et al. (1997)10
Hirschhaeuser et al. (2010)11
Kondo et al. (2011)12
La Barbera et al. (2012)13
Seano et al. (2013)14
  • Recapitulate tumor heterogeneity

  • More predictive than monolayer

  • High-throughput

  • Inexpensive

  • No immune or other cells of the tumor microenvironment

  • No vasculature

  • No self-assembly

  • Forced microanatomy

Tumor organoids Cheung et al. (2013)15
  • Display typical tumor histological characteristics

  • High-throughput

  • Cheap

  • No immune or other cells of the tumor microenvironment

  • No vasculature

Huang et al. (2015)16
  • Retain differentiation status, histo-architecture and phenotypic heterogeneity of primary tumor including patient tumors

  • Retain patient-specific physiological changes

  • High-throughput

  • No immune or other cells of the tumor microenvironment

  • No vasculature

  • Pancreatic progenitor cells plated on Matrigel

Li et al. (2014)17
  • Long term viability

  • Model diverse gastrointestinal malignancies from pancreas, stomach and colon in primary epithelial and mesenchymal organoid culture

  • Oncogenic trans- formation in vitro

  • Tumorigenicity after transplantation in vivo

  • No vasculature

Ex vivo tumor slice cultures Merz et al. (2013)18
Gerlach et al. (2014)19
Chadwick et al. (2015)20
  • Preservation of the individual histopathology

  • High-throughput

  • Explants’ blood vessels are isolated, not integrated into a surrounding network formed in vitro

  • Explant viability depends on the explant origin

  • Mostly applied to brain cultures

Cell sheet technology Kushida et al. (1999)21
  • Preservation of the deposited ECM and cell-cell interactions

  • Improved cell engraftment and tumor formation following subcutaneous mouse injection

  • No vasculature

  • No self assembly

  • Forced microanatomy

Microfluidic models Ehsan et al. (2014)22
  • Vasculature present

  • Use of spheroids

Bioreactors Ferranini et al (2013)23
  • Long term viability and histo-architecture of the tissue explants retained

  • Tissue blood vessel integrity maintained

  • Not suitable for drug screening

  • Not amenable for longitudinal microscopic imaging

  • Explants’ blood vessels are isolated, not integrated into a surrounding network formed in vitro

Domansky et al. (2010)24
  • High-throughput

  • Use of hepatocyte monocultures

  • No vasculature

Self-assembly Bazou et al.
  • Long term viability and histo-architecture of the tumor explant retained, including patient tumors

  • Explants’ blood vessel system retained

  • Explants’ blood vessels integrate into a surrounding network formed in vitro

  • Long term maintenance of in vitro vascular network

  • High-throughput

  • Inexpensive

  • Size of the explant is limiting (≤ 0.5 mm)

  • Vessel network requires ~7 days to establish