Table 4. Mismatch distribution analysis (MDA) of cpDNA sequence data for Rosa sericea complex from lineages as a whole and three lineages recognized by phylogenetic inferences.
| Line ages | Tajima’s D (p value) | Fu’s FS (p value) | τ | tmin (Ma) | tmax(Ma) | MDA | SSD (p value) | HRag (p value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over all | −1.6323(0.0140) | −20.9098(0.0000) | 0.734(0.609–1.125) | 0.04255(0.03531–0.06522) | 0.11218(0.09309–0.17194) | Unimodal | 0.1185(0.0000) | 0.0234(1.0000) |
| CPA | −1.5871(0.0250) | −6.4842(0.0440) | 1.052(0.000–3.436) | 0.06099(0.00000–0.19920) | 0.16079(0.00000–0.52516) | Unimodal | 0.0009(0.8740) | 0.0322(0.9390) |
| CPB | 0.1675 (0.6150) | −1.8907(0.2550) | 4.328(0.139–8.531) | NC | NC | Multimodal | 0.0173(0.5390) | 0.0637(0.6130) |
| CPC | 1.6769(0.9410) | 2.7972(0.8860) | 3.317(0.000–10.373) | NC | NC | Bimodal | 0.0855(0.0540) | 0.2293(0.0090) |
The values of the neutrality tests for each lineage were examined by Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs statistics. Goodness of fit of observed-to-theoretical mismatch distributions under a sudden (stepwise) expansion model (Rogers and Harpending 1992) is test with the sum of squared deviations (SSD) and Harpending’s raggedness index (HRag). Upper and lower 95% confidence limits around estimates of τ and associated ranges of t (in million years before present, Ma) are in parentheses.
NC, Not calculate