Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 3;9(12):e977209. doi: 10.4161/15592324.2014.977209

Table 1.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) subjected to callus induction, partial air desiccation and NaCl treatments in 3 rice genotypes

Stress Subject of ANOVA (Data source) Source of variation DF Mean sum of square
Callus Induction (CI) (Fig. 1) Genotype (G) 2 442.476**
    Media (M) 7 2.858**
    G × M 14
Salt induced stress Viability of callus (VC) (Table 1) Genotype (G) 2 7422.85**
    Salt concentration (SC) 4 8543.69**
    Callus culture period (CCP) 3 193.27**
    G × SC 8 581.68**
    G × CCP 6 4.36NS
    SC × CCP 12 7.27*NS
    G × SC × CCP 24 8.48
  Relative growth rate (RGR) (Fig. 3A) Genotype (G) 2 1.741**
    Salt concentration (SC) 4 9.414**
    G × S 8 0.132
  Tolerance index (TI) (Fig. 3B) Genotype (G) 2 0.039**
    Salt concentration (SC) 4 0.453**
    G × S 8 0.005
  Relative water content (RWC) (Fig. 3C) Genotype (G) 2 3.327**
    Salt concentration (SC) 4 38.644**
    G × SC 8 2.119
Partial air desiccation stress Plant regeneration (PR) (Table 2) Genotype (G) 2 604.34**
    Age of callus (AC) 3 803.94**
    Partial air desiccation (PAD) 4 686.17**
    G × AC 6 18.45NS
    G × PAD 8 45.93NS
    AC × PAD 12 124.71*
    G × AC × PAD 24 35.09
*

* = Significant at P < 0.01, * = Significant at P < 0.05, NS = Non-significant.