Table 4.
Effect of desiccation to NaCl stress on regeneration of 3 rice genotypes (% ± SE)
| NaCl (gL−1) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Variety |
Desiccation
(h) |
Cont. |
2.9 |
5.9 |
8.8 |
11.7 |
| BR10 | Cont. | 36.51 ± 1.59 | 31.75 ± 1.59 | 9.52 ± 2.75 | 3.17 ± 1.59 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 45 | 71.43 ± 4.76 | 68.25 ± 4.20 | 33.33 ± 2.75 | 14.29 ± 2.75 | 11.11 ± 3.17 | |
| BRRI dhan32 | Cont. | 36.51 ± 1.59 | 25.40 ± 1.59 | 9.52 ± 2.75 | 3.17 ± 1.59 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 45 | 74.60 ± 4.20 | 63.49 ± 3.17 | 20.63 ± 1.59 | 7.94 ± 3.17 | 4.76 ± 2.75 | |
| BRRI dhan47 | Cont. | 30.16 ± 1.59 | 28.57 ± 2.75 | 25.40 ± 3.17 | 23.81 ± 2.75 | 14.29 ± 2.75 |
| 45 | 60.32 ± 4.20 | 58.73 ± 3.17 | 49.21 ± 4.20 | 38.10 ± 2.75 | 26.98 ± 3.17 | |
Regeneration medium was MS + 2.0 mgL−1 BAP + 0.5 mgL−1 NAA + 1.0 mgL−1 Kin + different concentration of NaCl. In each case number of used callus was 63 in 3 replications.