Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 5;5:14416. doi: 10.1038/srep14416

Table 3. Results summary for the validated candidate miRNAs.

miRNA Function References DEG predicted as target RNAseq analysisa
RT-qPCR analysisb
High (RPKM) Low (RPKM) Log2 FC q-value High (RQ) Low (RQ) FC q-value
ssc-miR-92a Angiosenesis Bellera N.et al., 2014 HPGD 51,874.13 21,710.41 −1.26 0.032 0.376 0.347 1.09 0.515
Embryo implantation Su L.et al., 2014
Placentation Su L.et al., 2014
trophoblast differentiation Kumar P.et al., 2013
ssc-miR-101 Ginecological tumors Torres A.et al., 2010 HTRA3, ATP1B1, PTGS2, JUNB 430.21 187,19 −1.20 0.034 0.231 0.247 0.94 0.829
Embryo implantation Chakrabarty A.et al., 2007
Endometriosis Teague E.et al., 2010
ssc-miR-133a Uterine tumors Torres A.et al., 2010 ENPEP 533.76 1,777.17 1.74 0.050 0.168 0.255 0.66 0.290
Skeletal muscle development Lee J.et al., 2013
ssc-miR-181d Hypoxia Shen G.et al., 2013 MMP8, MME 55.51 124.35 1.16 0.046 0.580 0.611 0.95 0.698
Embryo implantation Su L.et al., 2014
Placentation Su L.et al., 2014
Endometrial stromal decidualization Estella C.et al., 2012

aIn the RNAseq analysis, expression values are shown as RPKM values (Reads per Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped reads) and mean difference between groups as the log2 transformed fold change (Log2FC).

bIn the RT-qPCR analysis, expression values are shown as mean relative quantities (RQ) and mean difference between groups is represented as the fold change (FC).