Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J AAPOS. 2016 Oct 1;20(6):481–485. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2016.08.004

Table 1. The retinal image quality classification systema.

Retinal image Good (acceptable) Fair (acceptable) Poor
Posterior pole Good focus, illumination, and exposure of disk center image; optic disk and the vessels in circular area up to at least 3 disk diameters from edge of disk in all 4 quadrants are clearly observed Reasonable focus, illumination, and exposure of disk center image; apresence of artifacts may obscure parts of disk center image so that vessels within circular region of 3 disk diameters surrounding disk cannot be visualized clearly in one or more quadrants Unable to visualize vessels within circular region of 3 disk diameters surrounding disk in all 4 quadrants
Temporal retina Nasal retina Superior retina Inferior retina Good focus, illumination, and exposure; vascular components, presence or absence of pathology, and avascularity can be ascertained with certainty in peripheral retina of the image Reasonable focus, illumination and exposure; presence of artifacts may obscure some parts of peripheral retina; not all peripheral vascular components, pathology, and avascularity can be determined with certainty Unable to visualize vessels, pathology, or avascular areas in retinal periphery
a

A single category of acceptable consisting of “good” and “fair” images was used in this analysis.