Figure 7. Learning influenced abDGCs impact on location discrimination.
(A) Experimental timeline. (B) Behavioral performance measured as trials to criterion in the baseline blocks and the laser illumination blocks, in naïve ArchT-GFP group (n = 6) and naïve GFP-control group (n = 5) performing (i) the difficult separation condition, and (ii) the easy separation condition. No significant difference was detected between groups [Difficult separation: repeated measure two-way ANOVA, illumination effect: F1,8 = 0.74, p=0.41; group effect: F1,8 = 0.31, p=0.60; mice group × illumination interaction: F1,8 = 3.16, p=0.12]. (C) There are no differences in success rates for naïve ArchT-GFP group and naïve GFP-control group performing either difficult separation or easy separation (Repeated measures two-way ANOVA, p>0.05). Error bars represent standard errors of mean (S.E.M.).