Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 23;5:e20148. doi: 10.7554/eLife.20148

Figure 1. Sequential establishment of chromatin accessibility at the MBT.

(A) (Left column) Single embryos were collected for ATAC seq at the indicated time points. Micrographs show stage-matched panels from a time-lapse image of a single Histone H2Av-GFP embryo. Scale bar = 10 μm. Coverage of sequence reads from accessible chromatin over the hunchback (center) and scylla (right) loci are shown. The hunchback P2 promoter/enhancer and associated shadow enhancer in addition to the later-acting stripe enhancer (arrows) are open and accessible at all time points measured. A schematic summarizing the regulatory interactions of the hunchback locus is shown at bottom left. The scylla TSS gains accessibility at NC12 + 9’ and is stably maintained thereafter. Scale bars (red) equal 1 kb. Plots show mean coverage from at least n = 3 replicates. (B) The fraction of each genomic feature present during each cell cycle is plotted as a stacked bar chart. ‘NC12 new’ and ‘NC13 new’ indicate the set of peaks newly called present in each respective cell cycle. Not shown: 2898 peaks not found to overlap with available genomic annotations used to classify enhancers, promoters, or insulators. (C) The association of functionally validated enhancers within each ATAC-seq timing class was calculated, and this plot shows what fraction of these are active at the indicated timepoints. Solid bars indicate the fraction of enhancers whose expression is first detected at the indicated timepoint. The lighter remaining bar indicates the total fraction of active enhancers associated with each ATAC-seq timing class. Color coding is as for panel B, and enhancers not overlapping with the ATAC-seq peaks are shown in red. The estimated elapsed time post NC11-NC13 for each scored stage of development (bottom axis) is indicated on the top axis. (D) Odds ratios for enrichment of the indicated genomic features and transcriptional regulators were calculated. Early chromatin accessibility is enriched for enhancers (p=2.54x10−109) and binding of Zelda (p=3.7x10−225). Late or dynamic chromatin accessibility is enriched for promoters (p=4.62x10−42), insulators (p=7.71x10−14), and binding of GAF (p=3.76x10−19). p-Values are from two-sided Fisher’s exact test on contingency tables constructed on [-/+ feature by early/dynamic].

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20148.002

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Selection of metaphase-staged embryos and inter-replicate reproducibility.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Probability of selecting embryos at interphase stages based on time following observation of the prior anaphase (see Materials and methods). Time-lapse movies of wild-type embryos (n = 23) were scored for timing of entry into mitotic metaphase. Metaphase entry times were assumed to be normally distributed, and a p-value indicating the likelihood of a staged embryo being within interphase were calculated for each of the indicated timepoints (x-axis). (B) Clustering of individual biological replicates. The total number of ‘open’ ATAC-seq fragments within the set of peaks associated with autosomes was calculated for each biological replicate. Correlation between samples (1-cor(samples)) was calculated and complete-linkage clustering was performed. Samples corresponding to metaphase NC11 (NC11_09, n = 3), metaphase NC12 (NC12_12, n = 4), and metaphase NC13 (NC13_18, n = 3) are color coded (dark red, red, and orange, respectively). (C) Detail of accessible chromatin profiles for each individual metaphase replicate over the hunchback locus. Coverage of ‘open’ ATAC-seq reads over the hunchback locus was plotted for each biological replicate of metaphase-staged embryos as indicated on the y-axis (CPM-normalized mean counts per 10 bp bin). Color coding is as in panel B. Genomic region plotted is as in Figure 1A, middle panel.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Fraction of accessible peaks during metaphase.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

(A) Peaks were called on pooled biological replicates corresponding to metaphase stages, and the fraction of peaks overlapping with accessible peaks during interphase stages was calculated. (B) The fraction of peaks corresponding to individual genomic features [enhancers, promoters, insulators, and other (uncategorized)] accessible during individual cell cycles is plotted. The average fraction of accessible features is indicated by a grey cross.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3. Read-length distribution and comparison of interphase and metaphase library preparations.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

Uniquely-mapping duplicate-filtered paired-end sequencing read sets were pooled by timepoint. A random sample of 100,000 reads for each timepoint was selected and the distribution of read lengths was plotted as shown above. The x-axis indicates the length in base-pairs of the mapped read and the y-axis indicates the number of reads of x base-pairs within the sample. In each plot, the leftmost peak corresponds to ‘open’ chromatin fragments, and the adjacent peak distribution corresponds to fragments protected by nucleosomes (or nucleosome-sized objects). The boxplots at right show the distribution of estimated input DNA concentration (left plot) and the distribution of uniquely mapping sequence reads (right plot) for interphase (n = 30) and metaphase (n = 10) staged samples. The p-value at the top of each plot was calculated by randomly assigning samples to similarly sized groups (n = 30 and 10) and calculating the difference between the average value in each group. The p-value indicates the frequency with which the difference between metaphase and interphase samples is greater than the difference between randomly selected samples (n = 1×105 permutations).

Figure 1—figure supplement 4. Browser view of tribbles.

Figure 1—figure supplement 4.

Figure 1—figure supplement 5. Browser view of empty spiracles.

Figure 1—figure supplement 5.

Figure 1—figure supplement 6. Browser view of Ultrabithorax.

Figure 1—figure supplement 6.

Figure 1—figure supplement 7. Browser view of sloppy paired 2.

Figure 1—figure supplement 7.

Figure 1—figure supplement 8. Browser view of forkhead.

Figure 1—figure supplement 8.

Figure 1—figure supplement 9. Browser view of giant.

Figure 1—figure supplement 9.

Figure 1—figure supplement 10. Browser view of Krüppel.

Figure 1—figure supplement 10.

Figure 1—figure supplement 11. Browser view of knirps.

Figure 1—figure supplement 11.

Figure 1—figure supplement 12. Browser view of even-skipped.

Figure 1—figure supplement 12.

Figure 1—figure supplement 13. Browser view of hairy.

Figure 1—figure supplement 13.

Figure 1—figure supplement 14. Browser view of odd-skipped.

Figure 1—figure supplement 14.

Figure 1—figure supplement 15. Browser view of fushi tarazu.

Figure 1—figure supplement 15.

Figure 1—figure supplement 16. Browser view of runt.

Figure 1—figure supplement 16.

Figure 1—figure supplement 17. Browser view of paired.

Figure 1—figure supplement 17.

Figure 1—figure supplement 18. Browser view of sloppy paired 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 18.

Figure 1—figure supplement 19. Browser view of odd-paired.

Figure 1—figure supplement 19.

Figure 1—figure supplement 20. Browser view of huckebein.

Figure 1—figure supplement 20.

Figure 1—figure supplement 21. Browser view of tailless.

Figure 1—figure supplement 21.

Figure 1—figure supplement 22. Browser view of wingless.

Figure 1—figure supplement 22.

Figure 1—figure supplement 23. Browser view of engrailed.

Figure 1—figure supplement 23.

Figure 1—figure supplement 24. Browser view of patched.

Figure 1—figure supplement 24.

Figure 1—figure supplement 25. Browser view of hedgehog.

Figure 1—figure supplement 25.

Figure 1—figure supplement 26. Browser view of crocodile.

Figure 1—figure supplement 26.