Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Voice. 2016 Jun 14;31(2):260.e11–260.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.009

Table I.

Characteristics of the investigated teachers, objective evaluation of the vocal folds and larynx by means of VLS and the subdivision into groups proposed by a team of speech pathologists and medical doctors.

Subject Gender Age Number of
monitored
workdays
Subject
taught
Self-reported
hearing
condition
VLS Group
1 Female 37 1 Math No nodules 1
2 Female 34 1 Math No nodules 1
3 Female 42 1 Italian - nodules and cysts 1
4 Female 54 1 Italian Yes bilateral nodules 1
5 Female 54 2 Italian No normal physiology 2
6 Female 49 1 Italian Yes hypercontraction 2
7 Male 59 2 Italian No vocal fold hyperemia 2
8 Male 43 2 Math No normal physiology 2
9 Female 58 2 Italian No normal physiology 2
10 Female 33 2 Math No normal physiology 2
11 Female 40 2 Math No hypercontraction 2
12 Female 47 1 Italian - normal physiology 2
13 Female 54 2 Italian Yes vocal fold hyperemia 2
14 Female 43 2 Italian No hypotonia 2
15 Female 58 1 Math No normal physiology 2
16 Female 34 2 Math No normal physiology 3
17 Female 55 2 Math No normal physiology 3
18 Female 52 2 Math No normal physiology 3
19 Female 38 2 Math No normal physiology 3
20 Female 56 2 Italian Yes normal physiology 3
21 Female 34 2 Italian - normal physiology 3
22 Female 39 2 English No normal physiology 3
23 Female 35 1 Italian/ Math No hypercontraction 3
24 Female 31 1 Italian No normal physiology 3
25 Female 40 2 Italian Yes hypercontraction 3
26 Female 38 2 English Yes normal physiology 3

Group 1 consists of subjects with structural voice disorders, Group 2, subjects with subjectively or functionally reported symptoms, and Group 3, with normal physiology.

Math = Mathematics.