Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 1;2016:5697692. doi: 10.1155/2016/5697692

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound for appendicitis with regard to gender, age group, and experience of examiner.

Diagnostic performance% (95% CI) LR+/LR− (95% CI)
Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
All patients 82 (75–89) 97 (94–99) 92 (85–96) 93 (90–96) 28 (15–55)/0.18 (0.12–0.26)
 Boys 83 (72–91) 98 (94–100) 93 (84–99) 92 (87–96)
 Girls 80 (67–92) 97 (94–99) 91 (78–99) 93 (89–98)

Age group (years)
 0–4 74 (45–92) 96 (84–100) 92 (66–100) 89 (75–96)
 5–9 86 (71–95) 100 (96–100) 100 (89–100) 95 (90–98)
 10–14 81 (67–91) 95 (90–99) 88 (74–96) 92 (87–95)

Examiner
 Pediatric radiologist 88 (76–95) 98 (93–100) 94 (86–99) 95 (90–99)
 Radiologist 71 (56–84) 97 (94–99) 90 (74–98) 91 (86–95)

PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; CI: confidence interval; LR: likelihood ratio.