Table 10.
Binary logistic regression to determine the impact of gross motor coordination problems in childhood on bonding with sedentary peers in adolescence.
Bonding with sedentary peers in adolescence | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Wald | df | p | OR | |
GMCPa | 0.61 | 6.64 | 1 | 0.005d | 1.84 |
Bonding with sedentary peers in childhoodb | 0.65 | 9.80 | 1 | 0.002 | 1.92 |
Age at baseline | 0.04 | 0.51 | 1 | 0.475 | 1.04 |
Sexc | 0.97 | 29.51 | 1 | 0.000 | 2.64 |
Intercept | −3.28 | 35.05 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.04 |
Nagelkerke‘s Pseudo-R2 | 0.095 | ||||
N | 817 |
GMCP, Gross motor coordination problems;
Reference, no GMCP in childhood;
Reference, bonding with physically active peers in childhood;
Reference, boys;
One-tailed.