Table 3. Mineral density as calculated from the Micro-CT scans.
| Segment | Treatment | T.A. (mm2) or T.V. (mm3)* | Obj.A. (mm2) or Obj.V. (mm3)* | Obj.A./T.A. or Obj.V./T.V.* (%) | Obj.Th. (mm) or Obj.S. (mm2)* | T. M. D. (gHA/cm3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| merus | ambient | 11.734 | 0.368 | 3.13 | 0.063 | 0.631 |
| reduced pH | 11.734 | 0.489 | 4.17 | 0.076 | 0.694 | |
| reduced pH/increased temp | 11.734 | 0.387 | 3.30 | 0.062 | 0.663 | |
| carapace | ambient | 5.056 | 0.191 | 3.78 | 0.061 | 0.562 |
| reduced pH | 5.056 | 0.186 | 3.67 | 0.063 | 0.634 | |
| reduced pH/increased temp | 5.056 | 0.155 | 3.06 | 0.058 | 0.613 | |
| dactyl* | ||||||
| low density | ambient | 2.997 | 2.089 | 69.70 | 14.359 | 1.294 |
| reduced pH | 3.063 | 2.019 | 65.91 | 14.132 | 1.344 | |
| reduced pH/increased temp | 2.844 | 1.490 | 52.38 | 17.929 | 1.455 | |
| high density | ambient | 2.997 | 0.747 | 24.91 | 12.488 | 1.877 |
| reduced pH | 3.063 | 0.879 | 28.70 | 13.978 | 1.879 | |
| reduced pH/increased temp | 2.844 | 1.011 | 35.54 | 25.348 | 1.853 | |
The carapace and merus were quantified via a 2D analysis by integrating 2D slices in the region of interest as defined by the total area (T.A.), while the dactyl was 3D analyzed in the total volume (T.V.) of interest. Area metrics presented refer to the merus and carapace. Volume metrics refer to the dactyl as indicated by the*. Obj.A or Obj.V. is the total object area or volume obtained inside the T.A. or T.V., respectively. Obj.A./T.A. is the object area divided by the total area, and Obj.V./T.V. is the object volume divided by the total volume; both metrics have the same units. Obj.Th. is the thickness of the object and Obj.S. is the surface area of the object’s volume. T.M.D. is the true mineral density calculated by correlating attenuation coefficients from images of sample and hydroxyapatite (HA) rods of known densities. The units for T.M.D are the same for the merus, carapace, and dactyl.