Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 28;6(4):291–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2016.08.006

Table 6.

Comparison of the Findings of This Study with Other Studies.

Reference of the study NFS (sen, spe, ppv, npv) (%) BARD (sen, spe, ppv, npv) (%) BAAT (sen, spe, ppv, npv) (%) APRI (sen, spe, ppv, npv) (%)
Present Study (India) 5.56, 100, NA, 66 45.83, 80.55, 61.11, 69.04
OR = 3.5
0, 100, NA, 76.66 29.16, 97.22, 87.5, 83.33
Ruffillo et al.30 (Argentina) 22.7, 100, 100, 81.3 51.4, 77.2, 45.2, 81.3 NA NA
Angulo et al.25 (Italy) 77, 71, 52, 88 NA NA NA
Harrison et al.22 (USA) NA OR = 17, NPV = 96, PPV = 43 NA NA
Ratziu et al.23 (France) NA NA 14, 100, NA, 100 NA
Kruger et al.31 (South Africa) 76, 69, 34, 94 NA NA 75, 86, 54, 93

sen = sensitivity, spe = specificity, ppv = positive predictive value, npv = negative predictive value.