Table 3. Prevalencea of medicines use to treat acute diseases in Brazil, according to sociodemographic characteristics. PNAUM, Brazil, 2014. (N = 41,433).
| Variable | Prevalence of medicines use to treat acute diseases | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| All | Male | Female | ||||
|
|
|
|
||||
| Prevalence | 95%CI | Prevalence | 95%CI | Prevalence | 95%CI | |
| Age groupb | < 0.001c | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |||
| 0-4 | 39.0 | 36.5–41.6 | 39.4 | 36.3–42.5 | 38.6 | 35.9–41.4 |
| 5-9 | 21.8 | 18.5–25.0 | 21.8 | 17.9–27.7 | 20.8 | 16.5–25.1 |
| 10-19 | 24.6 | 22.0–27.1 | 20.9 | 17.2–24.5 | 28.1 | 24.4–31.8 |
| 20-29 | 32.3 | 29.4–35.3 | 26.9 | 22.6–31.3 | 37.7 | 34.6–40.7 |
| 30-39 | 35.3 | 32.5–38.1 | 27.9 | 23.6–32.1 | 41.8 | 38.9–44.7 |
| 40-49 | 36.2 | 33.8–38.5 | 25.6 | 23.3–27.9 | 45.6 | 42.8–48.4 |
| 50-59 | 37.6 | 35.0–40.1 | 25.5 | 22.4–28.6 | 47.2 | 44.0–50.3 |
| 60-69 | 41.1 | 38.5–43.8 | 33.3 | 30.1–36.4 | 47.2 | 44.0–50.5 |
| 70-79 | 44.2 | 41.3–47.1 | 33.4 | 29.2–37.6 | 51.6 | 48.1–55.1 |
| ≥ 80 | 48.3 | 44.2–52.5 | 44.5 | 38.5–50.5 | 51.0 | 46.0–55.9 |
| Economic classificationd | 0.097 | 0.314 | 0.263 | |||
| A/B | 34.0 | 31.3–36.6 | 27.7 | 24.2–31.1 | 40.0 | 36.9–43.0 |
| C | 33.8 | 31.9–35.7 | 27.0 | 24.9–29.0 | 39.8 | 37.6–42.0 |
| D | 34.7 | 31.9–37.5 | 28.8 | 25.1–32.5 | 39.6 | 36.6–42.6 |
| E | 28.1 | 23.9–32.3 | 22.3 | 16.8–27.9 | 34.3 | 29.6–39.0 |
| Region | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |||
| North | 31.6 | 27.6–35.6 | 27.5 | 24.0–31.0 | 35.4 | 30.2–40.6 |
| Northeast | 40.2 | 37.8–42.7 | 33.6 | 30.4–36.7 | 45.9 | 43.3–48.5 |
| Southeast | 31.7 | 28.6–34.8 | 25.0 | 21.8–28.2 | 37.7 | 34.0–41.5 |
| South | 29.4 | 26.8–32.1 | 23.2 | 20.2–26.1 | 35.1 | 32.4–37.7 |
| Midwest | 35.4 | 32.6–38.2 | 28.3 | 24.8–31.7 | 42.4 | 39.2–45.7 |
| Total | 33.7 | 32.1–35.4 | 27.2 | 25.4–29.0 | 39.6 | 37.6–41.5 |
a Percentages adjusted by sample weights and post-stratification according to age and gender.
b In years.
c Pearson’s Chi-square test.
d The economic classification variable according to the Brazilian Economic Classification Criterion of the Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa (http://www.abep.org) had 77 ‘missing’.