Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 15;12(12):e1006496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006496

Fig 3. p35S:NF-YB2E65R cannot rescue the nf-yb2 nf-yb3 late flowering phenotype.

Fig 3

A) Flowering time quantification of 15–20 randomly selected T1 p35S:NF-YB2 and p35S:NF-YB2E65R plants in the Col-0 background. B) Flowering time quantification of 15–20 randomly selected T1 p35S:NF-YB2 and p35S:NF-YB2E65R plants in the nf-yb2 nf-yb3 background. C) Flowering time quantification of two independent, stable T3 p35S:NF-YB2 and p35S:NF-YB2E65R plant lines in the nf-yb2 nf-yb3 background (n≥12). D) Representative plants of p35S:NF-YB2 and p35S:NF-YB2E65R in the nf-yb2 nf-yb3 background. E) Relative transcript abundance of NF-YB2, FT and AP1 in stable T3 p35S:NF-YB2 and p35S:NF-YB2E65R plants in the nf-yb2 nf-yb3 background. Asterisks in 3A, 3B and 3C represent significant differences derived from one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05) followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison post hoc tests against nf-yb2 nf-yb3.