Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Jan;41(1):128–133. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000751

Table 3.

Potential predictors for disease specific survival in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumor

Univariate analysis MFS (multivariate analysis)
HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
Sex 0.96 0.43–2.13 0.920 0.61 0.35–1.05 0.072
Age 1.10 1.05–1.15 <0.001*
pT2 1.10 0.13–9.49 0.930
pT3 1.52 0.33–7.04 0.586 1.26 0.17–9.35 0.823
pT4 2.80 0.60–12.85 0.185 1.02 0.13–7.88 0.988
LN metastasis 1.19 0.35–4.05 0.775 0.98 0.47–2.05 0.967
MTD 11.89 1.60–88.45 0.016* 4.58 1.89–11.11 0.001*
Liver metastasis 5.08 1.19–21.75 0.028*
Histologic grade 0.71 0.16–3.21 0.653

Abbreviations: MSF, metastasis-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; LN, lymph node; MTD, mesenteric tumor deposit.

*

p<0.05.

Note: Age was entered as a continuous variable; pT3 and pT4 tumors were compared to combined pT1 and pT2 tumors in the univariate analysis; pT2, pT3, and pT4 tumors were compared to T1 in the multivariate analysis; the multivariate analysis was stratified by grade. WHO grade 1 was the reference category for histologic grade in the univariate analysis.