Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Jan;41(1):49–55. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000754

Table 1.

Clinical and pathologic details of sixteen cases with positive lymph nodes.

Case Age pT stageo MELF No. MELF glands per slide No. positive lymph nodes Positive lymph node locations* Largest metastatic focus size (mm) Morphology

16 58 1b Y 1 4 1,2 7 2
101 50 1b N 0 5 2 13 2
103ϒ 62 1b Y 13 1 1 5 2,3
109 47 3a Y 4 2 1,2 1.5 2,3
110 60 1b Y 1 1 1 ITC 1
176ϒ 62 3a Y 5 10 1,2 16 2,3
178ϒ 57 2 N 0 1 1 4 2
199 67 1a Y 5 3 1 5 1
206 54 1b Y 3 3 1 1.5 3
213 47 3a Y 12 5 1,2 10 1
253 77 1b Y 2 1 1 1 2
261 59 1b Y 17 1 1 2.5 1,3
317ϒ 57 3a N 0 9 1,2 8 1,2,3
328 64 3a N 0 2 1,2 7 2
363ϒ 58 2 N 0 2 1 3 1,3
444 66 1a Y 1 2 1,2 1.5 1
o

According to guidelines outlined by the AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook 2010

*

1=pelvic, 2=paraaortic

Morphologic description of lymph node metastases: 1=sinus histiocyte-like, 2=solid glandular, 3=cystic glandular

ITC, isolated tumor cells

ϒ

These patients are also represented in Table 2.