Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec;11(7):1006–1039.

Table 2.

Meta-regression analyses performed on each variable (univariate) and adjusted for all variables (multivariate)

Univariate meta-regression on ACLCdiff Groups included in analysis Mean coefficient (95% CI) p-value
Aerobic capacity 27 4.1 (95% CI: 1.5 to 6.6) p = 0.003
Gender distribution (% male) 33 −1.25 (95% CI: −7.4 to 4.9) p = 0.684
Mean age 29 −2.1 (95% CI: −0.3 to −0.1) p<0.001
Mean difference in peak RER values 24 −12.1 (95% CI: −68.8 to 44.6) p = 0.663
Risk of bias (SumQAT score) 34 −0.19 (95% CI: −2.6 to 2.2) p = 0.875
Multivariate meta-regression on ACLCdiff
Aerobic capacity 16 4.0 (95% CI: 0.81 to 7.2) p = 0.019
Gender distribution (% male) 16 4.5 (95% CI: −4.1 to 13.2) p = 0.268
Mean age (years) 16 −0.25 (95% CI: −0.4 to −0.06) p = 0.014
Mean difference in peak RER values 16 7.9 (95% CI: −59.0 to 74.8) p = 0.797
Risk of bias (SumQAT score) 16 0.9 (95% CI: −3.8 to 5.6) p = 0.682

ACLCdiff: difference between obtained AC VO2max and obtained LC VO2max, 95% CI: 95% confidence intervals, RER: respiratory exchange ratio, SumQAT: sum of quality assessment tool score