. 2016 Dec;11(7):1082–1100.

Table 4.

Relationship between Men's Gymnastics Functional Measurement Tool (MGFMT) Individual Item Raw Score and Total MGFMT Score and the Subjects’ Current USA-Gymnastics Competitive Level, Age, and Body Weight (n = 83)

	Splits Test	Shoulder Flexibility Test	Hanging Pikes Test	Overgrip Pull-ups Test	Handstand Push-up Test	Rings Hold Test	Agility Test	Vertical Jump Test	Star Excursion Balance Test	Handstand Hold Test	Total MGFMT Score
Test score vs. Competitive Level	0.004	0.01	0.29^*	0.51^*	0.24^*	0.36^*	0.55^*	0.64^*	0.10^*	0.44^*	0.63^*
Test score vs. Hours of Training per Week	0.003	0.02	0.21^*	0.43^*	0.26^*	0.313^*	0.36^*	0.49^*	0.07^*	0.38^*	0.56^*
Test score vs. Age	0.004	0.002	0.12^*	0.42^*	0.41^*	0.16^*	0.51^*	0.61^*	0.07^*	0.26^*	0.48^*
Test score vs. Body Weight (kg)	0.03	0.001	0.05^*	0.25^*	0.06^*	0.35^*	0.47^*	0.57^*	0.04	0.17^*	0.30^*

Values expressed in terms of Coefficient of Determination (r²)

Denotes statistically significant relationship (p<.05)