Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 29;6(1):34–43. doi: 10.1159/000449346

Table 2.

Results of the major Western series of HCC treated by MWA, RFA, or IRE

Author, year [reference] Number of patients/nodules Tumor size (cm)* CAR LRR 1-Y DFS 5-Y DFS 1-Y OS 5-Y OS
Niessen, 2016 [32] IRE: 34/65 IRE: 2.4; 0.2–7.1 IRE: 81.5% IRE: 35% n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
Cannon, 2013 [33] IRE: 14/18 IRE: 2.1; 1.3–4.5 IRE: 83% IRE: 50% n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
Cheung, 2013 [34] IRE: 11/18 IRE: 2.0; 1.0–6.1 IRE: 72% IRE: 0% RFA: 96% n.a. n.a. n.a.
MWA: 97%
Vogl, 2015 [31] RFA: 25/32 RFA: 3.2; 0.8–4.5 RFA: 84% RFA: 3% n.a. n.a RFA: 100% n.a.
MWA: 28/36 MWA: 3.6; 0.9–5 MWA: 89% MWA: 3% MWA: 100%
Groeschl, 2014 [35] MWA: 139 MWA: 2.6; 0.7–6 MWA: 94% MWA: 10% n.a. MWA: 7% n.a. MWA: 19%
N'Kontcho, 2009 [36] RFA: 235 RFA: 2.92; ±1** RFA: 95% RFA: 11% n.a. RFA: 32% n.a. RFA: 30%

CAR=complete ablation rate; LRR=local recurrence rate; n.a.= not available.

*

Values are the median and range;

**

Values are the mean and standard deviation.